Sunday, August 20, 2006

Sharia Law

Have you ever wondered what type of person could stone another in the modern world? Well, Muslims could, under their law, with no problem of conscious evidently. Mother of 2 faces death by stoning
Human rights groups and concerned individuals worldwide are demanding an end to stoning executions in Iran – and right now are pressuring the head of the Islamic nation's judiciary to lift the death sentence against a 34-year-old mother of two young children. Malak Ghorbany was sentenced to death June 28 by a court in the Iranian city of Urmia after being found guilty of committing "adultery." Under Iran's strict Sharia law, women sentenced to execution by stoning have their hands bound behind their back. They are wrapped from head to toe in sheets before being seated in a pit. The ditch is filled up to their breasts with dirt, and the soil is packed tightly before people assemble to execute the woman by pitching rocks at her head and upper body. Article 104 of the Iranian Penal Code states that the stones used for execution should "not be large enough to kill the person by one or two strikes, nor should they be so small that they could not be defined as stones."
Gub'mint regulation at it's finest!
Ironically, the court sentenced the woman's brother Abu Bakr Ghorbany and husband Mohammad Daneshfar to only six years in jail for killing her lover. According to Sharia law, murder carries a lesser penalty than "crimes against chastity."
Murder isn't as bad as adultery? Neither one is excusable, but I wonder what drove the lady to commit the "crime". The article doesn't say if her husband was abusive, or just a complete horse's rump, but I guess the circumstance the drove her to such an act doesn't come into play. Since I'm not an expert in any kind of law, I can only rely on my own common sense, and standards of right and wrong.
Lily Mazahery, president of the Legal Rights Institute in Washington, D.C., had the lead role in drafting the San Francisco resolution, telling WND: "Malak is receiving the penalty of death for having committed 'adultery,' which, under the Sharia legal system includes any type of intimate relationship between a girl/woman and a man to whom she is not permanently or temporarily married. Such a relationship does not necessarily mean a sexual relationship. Further, charges of adultery are routinely issued to women/girls who have been raped, and they are sentenced to death."
Excuse me? Only a man could come up with such a law thatpunishess a woman for being raped.
"The Islamic regime has been known to say one thing and do exactly the opposite," Mazahery said. "It is still quite possible that the Islamic regime will schedule a rush sham trial and re-issue the same sentence before we have a chance to take the appropriate legal actions. It is also possible that even with a new trial, Ghorbany would still receive the same sentence or be sentenced to death by public hanging instead."
Ya think?! Oh yes, hanging is so much better than stoning. (read sarcasm)
Ironically, Iran is a member of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, or ICCPR. The United Nations Human Rights Committee has indicated that treating adultery and fornication as criminal offenses does not comply with international human rights standards. Article 7 of the ICCPR reads, "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment." And Article 14 guarantees the right "to have legal assistance assigned to (the accused), in any case where the interests of justice so require."
Ah yes, that bastion of Human Rights... the UN. Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse. What moron let gave Iran that seat on the council? Gee, you'd think I didn't much care for the UN. Hmmmm....
"In 99 percent of these cases," Mazahery said, "the accused women have received no legal representation, and because, under the Sharia legal system their testimony is at best worth only half the value of the testimony of men, their so-called 'trials' last only a few minutes -– after which they are immediately sentenced."
Don't get me started! And this is the type of law many are advocating to bring the the Western world? I don't think so!!! H/T: Shining City Atop a Hill